Justin Richardson, a
lifeguard, knew the delights and dangers of a pool's
cool, indigo depths.
But Richardson, an
accomplished swimmer, didn't envision he'd become a
diving statistic when he took a 6-foot leap into a
friend's pool on the night of Aug. 10, 2003.
"I was trying to do a shallow
dive, like I knew to do," Richardson, a 24-year-old
North Carolina State University junior, said
recently from his home in Wendell, N.C. "I was a
competitive swimmer, but I just didn't look."
He hit the stairs and bruised
his spine where his neck meets his shoulders. The
accident left him with limited use of his hands and
arms and no feeling from his chest down.
Today, after undergoing an
experimental procedure in which Israeli surgeons
injected a type of white blood cells into his spinal
cord to help repair damaged nerves and tissue,
Richardson says he's regained about 95 percent
control of his arms and hands. Although he remains
in a wheelchair, he has regained the ability to feel
a dull sensation throughout his lower body.
Proneuron Biotechnologies,
the Israeli company that developed the surgical
method, soon will start a second phase of its trial,
this time in the United States. Proneuron is
partnering with several U.S. companies,
including Cell Dynamics, a Smyrna-based tissue and
cell processor. The Shepherd Center, an Atlanta
hospital that is a leader in the South for treating
spinal cord and brain injuries, also is a partner in
the project.
If Phase II and Phase III of
the trial are as promising as Richardson's
experience in Phase I, and it passes a battery of
reviews from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration,
the procedure could be a significant milestone in
the treatment of spinal cord injuries.
It also would be an important
step forward for the business, political and
university leaders pushing Georgia's fledgling
bioscience community, which industry experts say
lags that of more established centers in the
Northeast and on the West Coast.
Georgia boasts top-notch
bioscience research institutions, including Georgia
Tech, Emory University and the University of
Georgia. The state also is home to the U.S. Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention.
Unlike Boston, San Francisco,
San Diego and North Carolina's Research Triangle,
bioscience leaders that began fostering such
business years ago, metro Atlanta hasn't developed
much of a reputation in the industry.
Instead, in the 1980s and
'90s, the business community here staked its fortune
on telecommunications, software and other
computer-related industries.
As those industries waned or
shipped operations overseas, state officials and
some of Georgia's leading corporate and university
leaders started working to develop a biosciences
center.
The Proneuron project, which
received a $3.16 million grant from Home Depot
co-founder Bernie Marcus' foundation, is just one
example that city and state efforts are beginning to
have an effect, proponents say.
They say bioscience companies
will create jobs, increase the pool of local talent
and help position the state to attract large drug
firms like Merck & Co. The pharmaceutical giant is
building a vaccine plant in Durham, N.C., that is
expected to employ 200 by 2009 and pay an average
annual salary of $57,000. Merck considered Georgia
but chose North Carolina because it has a much
larger base of bioscience firms and pool of
professional workers.
In numbers of bioscience
firms, Georgia ranks 11th among states and Canadian
provinces in North America, according to Ernst &
Young's 2004 Global Biotechnology Report.
"It's getting there, but it's
not robust yet," Wayne Clough, Georgia Tech's
president, said at a recent board meeting of the
Georgia Research Alliance.
The GRA, formed in 1990,
seeks to raise the state's bioscience profile by
recruiting scientists in disciplines including AIDS,
cancer research, agricultural biotechnology and
biomedical engineering.
To date, the GRA, whose board
members hail from some of Georgia's marquee
corporations, including BellSouth, Synovus Financial
Corp. and United Parcel Service, has recruited some
50 scientists and drawn more than $1.3 billion in
federal and state tax dollars and private funding
for research.
All told, those research
projects in biosciences and advanced communications
technology have created 1,500 direct jobs, support
an additional 28,000 jobs statewide and indirectly
funnel an estimated $2 billion through Georgia's
economy, according to the alliance.
Spinning out that research
into thriving businesses — the other part of GRA's
efforts — has been harder.
In part, that's because
Georgia hasn't viewed bioscience as an economic
development engine the way it has manufacturing
plants, say people in the bioscience and economic
development communities.
The state's incentives
packages are primarily tailored to large-scale
operations, such as an auto plant, and aren't
necessarily applicable to start-ups like Cell
Dynamics.
The 4-year-old company is
spending $750,000 to construct a laboratory for the
Proneuron project. But it doesn't qualify for state
assistance because it has fewer than 25 employees.
"The state is slow and a
little bit behind in its incentives program," said
Robert McNally, a Cell Dynamics founder and the
company's chief executive officer.
Faced with the real threat
that some of these university research projects
might evolve into businesses that set up shop — and
create jobs — in other states, Georgia is
responding.
"The understanding is
improving," said Michael Cassidy, GRA president. "We
have a governor that's keen on building this from
the ground up."
The state created the Life
Sciences Facilities Fund last year to help
bioscience companies just starting out. A
private-public partnership of the GRA and the
Georgia Department of Economic Development, the fund
lends money to start-ups.
In return, the state receives
equity in the companies, which also must repay the
loans.
"Those types of companies get
to a point where they're not yet bankable, and it's
hard for them to get a loan," said Chris Clark, the
agency's deputy commissioner of public affairs and
policy.
Alpharetta-based Inhibitex, a
biopharmaceutical firm that is in early phases of
testing treatments to combat bacterial and fungal
infections, received $2.5 million to finance a
laboratory.
This month, Gov. Sonny Perdue
created the Strategic Industries Loan Fund to help
counties attract companies in target industries such
as bioscience. "Are we where we want to be? No,"
Clark said. "But are we farther along than we were
12 months ago? Absolutely."
Head start for rivals
For Georgia to become a
serious rival to places like California and North
Carolina's Research Triangle, it will take time,
experts say.
And a lot of money.
Many of those places had
decades long head starts and have state backing,
investment capital and — most crucial — the mass of
people in the biosciences industry needed to sustain
growth.
"The issue is management,"
said Russell French of Noro-Moseley Partners, an
Atlanta-based venture capital firm. "That management
pool is not as deep here as it is in other places,
because there's not that many examples of successes
that draw entrepreneurs here."
Bioscience firms have a long
time line — most notably, getting FDA approval —
before an idea goes from a thought to a product for
sale.
All that time in between
requires a constant stream of funding.
"You don't have 25 major
successes that cause people to get out of their warm
bed somewhere at Emory or Georgia Tech and jump into
the entrepreneurial side of biosciences," French
said of Georgia's bioscience industry. "Success
breeds the courage to try it yourself."
Success also brings in more
investment capital.
Georgia's bioscience industry
garnered $27 million in venture capital in the
second quarter of this year, according to
PricewaterhouseCoopers. That compares with the $47
million that software, information technology and
semiconductor firms in Georgia netted during the
same period.
For the first half of the
year, the state had two bioscience investment deals,
compared with 26 such deals in Massachusetts and 51
in California, worth $437 million and $662 million,
respectively, according to PricewaterhouseCoopers.
"There is a factor of
critical mass that I think every state has got to
address," said Kirk Walden, a PricewaterhouseCoopers
analyst. "That comes into play for any industry but
in particular the biomedical industry, which has
these longer-term horizons."
Israeli connection
"We're seeing lots of
interesting companies in the pipeline like
Proneuron," said Tom Glaser, president of the
American-Israel Chamber of Commerce's Southeast
region. The chamber helped broker the deal for Cell
Dynamics, Proneuron and the Shepherd Center.
Israeli bioscience firms have
increased their interest in Georgia as a viable
center for bioscience business, Glaser said.
"They've recognized how serious we are, even though
Georgia is not considered one of the top three or
four centers for this kind of activity."
Since May, Shepherd has been
recruiting patients for the second phase of the
trial. Though only 40 are needed, the hospital has
fielded hundreds of calls from all over the country,
Central America and South America. Shepherd has
drawn more patients as a result, said Michael Jones,
the Shepherd Center's vice president of research
"Frankly, anything we do in
the cellular therapy arena will have a huge impact
on the general population," he said. "It's really an
exciting time."
Richardson, who suffered the
diving accident last year, said he's not holding
high expectations for a full recovery. Still, he
acknowledges, the research and resulting surgery has
given him a life that would not have been possible
10 years ago.
"At the time of my injury, I
went from being totally self-sufficient to having
someone feed me and take me to the bathroom,"
Richardson said.
"To have my independence
back, it's more than I could ask for."
PRONEURON'S PROJECT
Unlike most of the
human body, human spinal cords don't have the
ability for significant wound repair. Proneuron,
based in Israel and partnering with several cell
processing centers and hospitals in the United
States, including in metro Atlanta, is in the trial
phases of a procedure that could be a significant
step in the treatment of spinal cord injuries.
The procedure calls for a 2-by-3-inch skin graft of
the injured person's inner bicep. That graft is then
cultured to produce a type of white blood cell,
called a macrophage. These macrophages are then
injected six times into the spinal column, just
below the site of injury.